Saturday, July 4, 2020

The Renaming of Camp A. A. Humphreys



While I was in basic training in 1984, a self-professed “redneck” kid from Alabama made the offhand comment “America has never lost a declared war.”  My retort, “Well…the North never has” wasn’t taken kindly.  From that moment on, his disdain for me was readily apparent.  I actually meant no harm and was just following a lifelong compulsion with blurting out whatever thought comes to mind.  Having grown up in Colorado, I didn’t know what it was like to grow up white in the South.  Conversely, I’d never seen life through the eyes of his black neighbors.   Once again I find myself falling prey to my compulsion, though somewhat more tentatively this time, to share my thoughts on a sensitive subject.

Google is always up on my computer and I constantly find myself delving deeper into the bright and shiny objects crossing my online path.  Efforts to rename some of our military bases and the resistance against it captured my attention a couple of days ago.  Realizing how little I knew about the history of our bases, even the ones we’ve been stationed at, I starting putting Google to work.  An article (1) by retired Brigadier General Ty Seidule, a professor emeritus of history at West Point, caught my eye and is the impetus for this blog.  I also ran across an illuminating lecture he gave a few years back at Washington and Lee University in Virginia as a distinguished alumni.  In his own words, spoken in front of Robert E. Lee’s crypt, “History is dangerous and the truth is ruthless.”  


In 1935, President Franklin D. Roosevelt renamed a military base honoring a prominent Civil War military leader, Brigadier General A. A. Humphreys (2) to Fort Belvoir as an obvious political favor to Democratic Representative Howard W. Smith, later a leader of the powerful but informal anti-Civil Rights coalition. [3] Representative Smith’s motivation isn’t hard to ascertain, since a base named after a Union general located in a southern state was certainly viewed as a thorn in his side.  Eighty five years have passed and, in my opinion, America has changed for the better.  Is it time to reflect this transformation with another name change?

Just knowing “Belvoir” is a French word meaning “beautiful view” is probably enough to convince (General Lafayette aside) some in my audience.  Knowing Belvoir was previously a slave plantation will certainly influence many others.  Knowing the Belvoir Plantation was owned by Lord Thomas Fairfax (4), a British loyalist during the American Revolutionary War, is by itself enough to persuade me.  However, agreeing on his recommended name change is where I part company with Professor Seidule.

As a West Point professor, I’m certain BG Seidule can back up his assertion Ulysses S. Grant was “the finest officer to ever wear a U.S. Army uniform.”  However, I disagree with his recommendation to rename Fort Belvoir in his honor.  Military prowess shouldn’t be the only consideration.  I suspect a now considerably older redneck man in Alabama might once again take offense over naming a southern base after a Union general.   A more extreme example would be to name a base in Georgia after General Tecumseh Sherman. (5)  In an attempt to heal an old wound, why should we inflict a new and possibly even more damaging one?  History should never be falsified or erased, but what we choose to honor should be carefully considered.

General Robert E. Lee made the wrong choice at a critical juncture in his life, but I still believe his thoughts on healing America’s Civil War wounds are worth repeating. (6)I think it wiser, moreover, not to keep open the sores of war, but to follow the example of those nations who endeavored to obliterate the marks of civil strife, and to commit to oblivion the feelings it engendered.”  For over 150 years, we haven’t heeded General Lee’s advice.  Why should we listen now?

Will a change move America further on the path toward redemption? Will a change provide an opportunity for those oppressed to offer forgiveness?  Will a change reduce division and lead to greater unity within our military services?  I’m convinced changing the name of Fort Belvoir to Fort Desmond T. Doss will accomplish all three.

Corporal Desmond Thomas Doss is a hero truly worthy of the honor.  “As an unarmed Army medic, Desmond T. Doss, the first conscientious objector to be awarded the Medal of Honor, was credited with saving the lives of 75 men during the Battle of Okinawa. Fellow soldiers who had subjected him to ridicule, and worse, saw him for the principled and brave man he was.” (7) If you aren’t familiar with Desmond Doss, I highly recommend researching him on the Internet and/or watching the movie “Hacksaw Ridge”.  While the movie has some historical inaccuracies, it does bring an honest depiction of his heroism to life.

Naming a base in Virginia for a Virginia native and WWII hero is well justified. Additionally, Fort Belvoir is primarily a support base and honoring a medic would be appropriate.  Desmond Doss epitomizes American stubbornness, idealism, and faith.  Based on his job in a ship yard, he could’ve taken a deferment.  Instead, he enlisted.  As a conscientious objector, he was mistakenly assigned to a combat unit.  Still, he persevered and lived true to his convictions.   Finally, when placed in the Okinawa crucible, he displayed courageous heroism, demonstrated exemplary humanity, and experienced tremendous personal sacrifice.  Should the name be changed again?  I only ask you place both Belvoir and Doss on a scale and weigh for yourself.

Thursday, April 9, 2020

Coronavirus Advice From a Random American in Korea

There’s a reason casinos make money.  They fully trust in statistical probability and have a multitude of customers believing somehow they are an exception.  The house will pay no heed to any individual placing a single bet, winning, and walking away never to return.  There are more than enough who stay until their pockets are empty and others until their bank account is drained and credit cards maxed out.  Sadly, there are those who even stay at the table until they’ve lost their home or worse.

As for COVID-19, death is going to collect the house take.  There is nothing we can do about it.  The only way to reduce the human cost is by reducing the number of people with the virus.  Shutting down most of America is mitigating the crisis, but isn’t sustainable and is coming at a tremendous cost to her prosperity.  Ending the shutdown in totality isn’t the answer either.  We need to find a way to keep people out of the coronavirus casino.  The answer is actually simple, but hard to implement.  Korea still remains one of the best models.

Why was Korea able to keep borders open and business operating throughout the crisis?  Why did their schools reopen this week?  First, they implemented an identification, isolation, and contact tracing program,  preventing case numbers in most areas from ever becoming unmanageable, and effectively permitting daily life to continue with appropriate limitations.  They continue to aggressively work every identified case.   Yesterday, they completed 20,650 tests for yesterday’s 47 positive cases (439 negative cases for every positive).   They continue to maintain a testing capability in excess of their requirements because they’ve never let the total number get beyond control.  Korea is one of the most densely populated countries in the world and what works here should work anywhere.  For more detail, take a look at the Korean CDC’s daily press release.
 https://www.cdc.go.kr/board/board.es?mid=a30402000000&bid=0030

In Korea, extreme measures have been focused on the areas with the greatest problem (primarily the Daegu area and the airport). Areas without cases have correspondingly fewer restrictions. Given a rapid testing capability, many of our rural areas and sparsely populated states in America could quickly resume a semblance of normal life.  I believe most already have individuals who keep track of where everybody else has been and what they think they’ve been doing. ;)  Once the shutdown lowers the case number to a manageable level (many communities are already there) restrictions can be lessened appropriately in those cities, counties, and states.  Without the tools, they’ll continue entering the casino (at just a relatively slower rate of growth) and greatly risk overwhelming their irreplaceable health care heroes.


The second critical factor is protecting individuals when they go out in public.  As individuals, we can protect ourselves using common sense and basic hygiene appropriate for the environment we are living in (and we’ll continue to live in for the foreseeable future).  I was encouraged to see America’s shift in attitudes towards wearing masks.  It seems to be working in Asia. However, we need to go further.  Since N95 masks protect our health care professionals in close proximity to the most contagious cases, a member of the general public should be just as protected.  If everyone in public was wearing the best available masks, the contagious would be restrained and everyone without the virus would be reasonably protected.  I understand the urgency of distributing our limited supply to those on the front lines, but I have yet heard this question asked, “When will production of N95 masks be readily available to all Americans?”  I’m looking forward to FINALLY returning to my country and attending “Mask Day” at the ballpark!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I currently have some free time to update my blog from 10 days ago.  I was in the wrong place at the wrong time last week and the coach benched me until 2 April.  I was wearing a mask, kept at least 6 feet from everyone, and used hand sanitizer when I got back in my car.  While my chance of catching the virus is extremely low (and I don’t have any symptoms), these are the rules we’re playing by.

For Korea, I’m encouraged by the Korean CDC data.  The country looks like it is well on the down side of the curve. Since 16 March, the number of individuals isolated with COVID-19 has dropped from 6,789 to 4,398 (further reducing the stress on the health care system).  Additionally, the number of patients being discharged continues to be greater than number of new cases.  They are capable of completing over 18,000 tests a day and aren’t using their full capability.  I read yesterday, they are even sending tests to America now.

With significant limitations, Korea has continued to stay in business.  They haven’t shut off visitors from China, Europe, and the US.  Of today’s new cases, 21 came from the airport.   Testing, contact tracing, disinfection, and isolation processes are working.  While the death rate has risen from ~1% to 1.59%, the rate reduction in overall infections has greatly limited the number of deaths.

I’ve done some reading on Germany and their low death rate .85% isn’t just luck.  They implemented an effective testing program early and have locked their country down.  No more than two people can meet.  If they were any stricter, they’d be missing out on the “Coronakids” boom expected next year ;)  Unfortunately, they can’t loosen up until their overall active numbers (and those of their neighbors are lower).

As for America, I don’t feel good about writing down what I believe.  While the death rate has only risen from 1.64% to 1.74%, the number of total cases has ballooned out of control, we’re well past where a testing and contact tracing methodology would work, and our health care system is in for a difficult time. My prayer, is we’re spared the grief of Italy and Spain.

Quickly cutting off travel from China and Europe bought us time, but the infection numbers have grown to the point where contact tracing isn’t feasible and lock-downs are the only option.  For example, Korea completed 15,028 tests today for 105 new cases.  America identified 17,412 new cases today. To achieve the same rate, we’d have to complete 2,492,000 tests in one day.  The president’s decision to push social distancing guidelines to 30 April is unavoidable.  After listening to a Bill Gates interview yesterday, I'm convinced a 15-day nationwide shutdown at the start would be also prudent.

Country
Total Cases
Deaths
Death Rate
USA
140,990
2,457
1.74%
Italy
97,689
10,779
11.03%
China
81,439
3,300
4.05%
Spain
80,110
6,803
8.49%
Germany
62,095
525
0.85%
France
40,174
2,606
1.74%
Iran
38,309
2,640
6.89%
UK
19,522
1,228
6.29%
Switzerland
14,829
300
2.02%
Netherlands
10,866
771
7.10%
Belgium
10,836
431
3.98%
S. Korea
9,583
152
1.59%






From March 19
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The odds are pretty low the government or media will listen to Coronavirus advice from some random American living in Korea, but I’ve been blessed with Freedom of Speech, a blog with 2 followers, and an ever present hope that something I write will someday go viral.  Plus, everyone who actually reads this post from start to finish will eventually find a package of toilet paper on a grocery store shelf near home. Now for the advice!

Instead of spinning the Coronavirus for political advantage, our media and politicians should work together on solving the crisis at hand.  They could be a tremendous force for good if they’d just focus everyone’s attention on how we can best pull together to stem the spread of the Coronavirus.  My advice is simple to say, but not so simple to implement.  America must rapidly take decisive steps to improve two simple metrics.

1.   The total number of COVID-19 tests completed daily.
2.   COVID-19 Death Rate - The number of deaths divided by the number of confirmed cases.
Testing is crucial in quickly identifying, isolating, and treating those infected.  Unfortunately, the United States is playing catch up in regards to testing.  Take a look at the Korean Center for Disease Control (KCDC) testing data for comparison later with the US:


[Table 1. Total confirmed and suspected cases]

Period
(since 3 Jan)
Total
Tested positive
Being tested
Tested negative
Confirmed
Discharged
Isolated
Deceased
As of 0:00
17 March (Tues)
286,716
8,320
1,401
6,838
81
17,291
261,105
As of 0:00
18 March (Wed)
295,647
8,413
1,540
6,789
84
16,346
270,888
Differences
+8,931
+93
+139
-49
+3
-945
+9,783

Korea has a capacity to complete 18,000 tests a day and aggressively follows up on the contacts of individuals testing positive.   While a total victory in this war of attrition isn’t possible, at risk individuals are being given a fighting chance.  The death rate (84/8,413) is slightly less than 1% and holding steady over time.  I’m also encouraged that the number of patients discharged has exceeded the number of new cases every day this week, reducing the stress on the health care system. 

Now look at America’s Center for Disease Control (CDC) test reporting page.


I believe it’s time for several levels of CDC mid-level management to be moved (you can’t fire civil servants) to less important jobs.  They have a nice looking site, but the data is of little real value. The chart shows a current capacity to administer 4,000 tests a day, but the notes at the bottom are telling.  The CDS counts a test when they receive it, the public health labs when the test is given, and private labs aren’t even being tracked.  How many boxes are stacked up in the labs and how long have they been there?

Telling the public a million (or even a billion) test kits have been distributed only misleads the public.   A test kit is just swabs and some tubes to place them in.  The number of tests administered is a step up, but still misleading as is the date it arrives at the labs. A test isn’t of any value until the results are given to the individual, their doctor, and public health officials. 

Even if all 4,000 tests being reported were actually completed, the number isn’t sufficient to achieve Korea’s level of performance.  Based on the USA’s larger population, we’ll require the capability to complete ~115,000 tests a day.  The CDC needs to start publishing a valid test metric and the goal we must achieve to succeed.   Once we know what the goal is and how to measure it, the media can justly hold the politician’s feet to the fire.  How many tests were completed today?  How many will be completed tomorrow?  When are we going to achieve full capacity?

The death rate is a morbid but important statistic, because it measures the overall effectiveness of a country’s effort.  The lowest possible percentage is where everyone impacted receives the best possible treatment.  A higher number likely indicates inequities in treatment, health care systems and providers being stressed beyond there capability, or a significant number of unidentified carriers.  As of today, America's rate is 1.64% (9,464 cases/155 deaths).  I suspect a large part is due to unidentified cases, but that will quickly change if our health care system becomes overwhelmed.

An interesting article on death rates:



“According to Anthony Fauci, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, COVID-19's mortality rate is probably around 1%, which is still about 10 times the flu's.”

Italy, Iran, and Spain illustrate what can happen if transmission rates get out of control and overwhelm the health care systems.  It would be unconscionable for any country to not give all its citizens a fighting chance.  My prayer is the unprecedented actions being taken worldwide will quickly stem the tragic loss of life inflicted by this pandemic.  Our local, state, and national leaders should judge their own performance on the results of the actions they take today, not what they did or didn’t do yesterday.  All I want to hear tomorrow is we completed a greater number of tests and the controllable portion of the death rate has been reduced and fallen below 1.64% There’ll be plenty of time to claim credit and affix blame after the crisis has passed.  #killthevirus